The TIME holds Ulrich fixed beak that it was mainly young researchers who criticized the plagiarism Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg:
"However - and this is the bitter aftertaste of the affair - it was not the comfortably leading representatives of research, which have upheld the scientific ethos, have done the contrary, students and individual professors who made themselves so personally vulnerable Thus the 'Causa Guttenberg' on the one hand, a triumph. science, but also an indictment of the German research organizations with a history . Moment missed "
With Mirror Online may Tobias Bunde, author of doctoral Briefs , agree in interview only:
" Is , is exactly what we wanted to hold up even a small doctoral flags. And now it has become a rather large flag. The Great in the scientific enterprise have been reported too late, as just had the little ones the magazine in your hand "
also interesting to note this.
"Actually we had at the beginning of Internet things relatively little about. Without the support of many people who appeared on the Web and have just been through, we could not have done."
reading value also this article Mark Becker at Spiegel online that explains why the survey results to Guttenberg's resignation be so different depending on whether you ask television viewers, newspaper readers and internet users. Internet users were more likely to resign than users of other media. "'There are two types of opinion', says the social psychologist Fritz Strack Würzburg. Experts speak of a central and a peripheral route of persuasion. 'Take online surveys from opinions that were formed by an active engagement with the facts, "said Strack. Because here users are expected to have obtained their knowledge from multiple sources and therefore are less susceptible to the influence of images. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment